Sidney Reilly’s Edwardian Gray Suit

Sam Neill as Sidney Reilly in "An Affair With A Married Woman", the first episode of Reilly: Ace of Spies.

Sam Neill as Sidney Reilly in “An Affair With A Married Woman”, the first episode of Reilly: Ace of Spies.

Had he not been killed by the Soviets in 1925, Sidney Reilly may have lived to be 140 last weekend- March 24th to be specific. However, a 140-year-old man is very unlikely, especially with his lifestyle and habits, so something would’ve probably gotten him anyway.


Sam Neill as Sigmund Rosenblum, later renamed “Sidney Reilly” upon his entry into the British Secret Service

London, Spring 1901

Series: Reilly: Ace of Spies
Episode: “An Affair with a Married Woman” (Episode 1)
Air Date: September 5, 1983
Director: Jim Goddard
Costume Designer: Elizabeth Waller


This is the first we see of Reilly – still known as Rosenblum – back home in London after his first mission, the details of which will be covered in a later post. After an assignation with his prostitute mistress Rose, he resurfaces at a public meeting in Covent Garden where the British Secret Service is denying his own existence. In a cheeky fashion that recalls James Bond, he gets the best of everyone. Later, we also see him wearing the same suit for a series of meetings and the funeral of his aforementioned mistress.

This first episode, “An Affair With A Married Woman”, establishes the Sidney Reilly character as the suave and opportunistic secret agent he wanted for himself, rather than the selfish, greedy, and murderously brilliant war profiteer and bigamist he actually was.

What’d He Wear?

Prior to these scenes, we have only seen Reilly in the warm Azerbaijan city of Baku, wearing either one of his cream-colored suits or full white tie, neither of which would be appropriate for daily errands on a spring day in London where, naturally, it is raining. Instead, Reilly outfits himself in a very smart and very vintage three-piece gray suit.

Reilly’s suit also provides a good contrast to the others, the stuffier Englishmen running the government, still decked out in the 19th century-style frock coats and cravats. Reilly is younger and more fashion-forward, establishing his role within the series of developing a style of espionage that became necessary as the old world became the new.

Even the young-ish Fothergill, standing behind Reilly/Rosenblum, looks like part of an older generation in his frock coat, standing collar, and cravat.

Even the young-ish Fothergill, standing behind Reilly/Rosenblum, looks like part of an older generation in his frock coat, standing collar, and cravat.

The mid-gray sack coat is ventless with notch lapels. The lapels are small due to the high-fastening 4-button front, often worn Richmond-style – the contemporary name for only buttoning the top of a 4-button suit coat. There are 3 buttons on each cuff, separated by a seam from the rest of the coat sleeve. The breast pocket is slanted towards the center and the hip pockets are straight with squared flaps.

Additional details include a center seam down the back, swelled edges, and gentle waist suppression to accentuate the long, lean silhouette favored by men around the turn of the century.

A fine suit for both action and contemplation.

A fine suit for both action and contemplation.

The waistcoat (vest) is a matching shade of mid-gray. It is very high-fastening due to the double-breasted layout, with 14 buttons (2 columns of 7 buttons) down the front. In addition, it has welted chest and hip pockets and – like the jacket – swelled edges. An adjustable rear strap across the gray silk rear lining maintains the lean look of the era.

Reilly is awfully proud of his buttons.

Reilly is awfully proud of his buttons.

Reilly wears a silver-toned pocket watch in his vest pocket, attached to a silver “single Albert” chain and a shield-shaped fob. The fob was developed in the late 1700s when men carried two pocket watches, one on each end of the chain. Luckily, men quickly grew out of this celebration of excess and, by the early 1800s, only the fob remained at the other end of the chain.

Reilly's FOB is visible as he receives a dressing down from Zaharov.

Reilly’s FOB is visible as he receives a dressing down from Zaharov.

The matching flat front trousers rise high on his waist with no rear pockets and plain-hemmed bottoms. They ostensibly have the fishmouth rear for Reilly’s unseen suspenders.

This is about as much as we see of Reilly's pants and, since they're presumably about to be removed, it doesn't do us much good.

This is about as much as we see of Reilly’s pants and, since they’re presumably about to be removed, it doesn’t do us much good.

Reilly’s dress shirt is crisp and white with double (French) cuffs, fastened with round silver two-sided cuff links. The shirt has a stiff and slim white club collar held in place with a silver stud.

He wears a thin black necktie, tied with a small four-in-hand knot and kept in place with a pearl stickpin. The tie is barely visible over the small opening at the top of the vest.


“Ace of Spies”? More like “Ace of Smiles”, am I right?
Ugh, I hate puns.

If his tie is any indication, any of Reilly’s non-suit/shirt attire will be black. That includes black leather laced dress shoes, black dress socks, and a black pocket square.

Heading outside? Reilly naturally wears a black homburg with a black band with his black leather gloves. If it’s especially cold, he adds his black double-breasted belted overcoat, which has peak lapels and velvet collars. The overcoat fastens with a 4-button (2×2 front) and is fitted with velvet cuffs. There are two flapped hip pockets and a flapped ticket pocket on the right side.

There's something awesomely sinister about this...

There’s something awesomely sinister about this…

If it’s raining, and it’s London, so it’s raining, Reilly has his trusty black umbrella and black walking stick.

Go Big or Go Home

We learn a lot about Reilly and his methods right off the bat. He is cunningly manipulative and, although the series addresses some hardships of his youth, we never get any clear commentary on whether or not his traits were a direct result of his troubled past. However, we do learn Reilly’s beserk button is pushed when a woman he cares for is mistreated. After the murder of Rose (spoiler alert – oops), he calmly but angrily begins aiming in every direction.

Sometimes literally.

Sometimes literally.

Reilly’s persistence pays off and he discovers Basil Zaharov, a real life shady arms dealer who may or may not have had actual ties to Reilly, was behind the murder. Hot-headed but not totally irrational, Reilly announces his plan to systematically destroy Zaharov’s network of spies, some of which are in very high places, until the true murderer is exposed. While a good strategic move, Reilly fails to take into account his prey’s own power. Let’s assume you’re a Mad Men fan…

In the first season’s penultimate episode, smarmy piece of wiener cheese Pete Campbell confronted series alpha male Don Draper with information about Don’s true past. Don tells Pete, “When you threaten someone in this manner, you should be aware of the fact that if your information is powerful enough to make them do what you want, what else can it make them do?” After this delivery (in Jon Hamm’s voice, no less), Pete shit himself.

Unfortunately, Reilly is the Pete Campbell in this situation. However, Reilly’s Don – Zaharov – sees Reilly’s potential and takes it upon himself to kill the actual murderer after putting through Reilly a scary but gentlemanly mock execution. Lesson learned for Reilly, who now has additional reason to view the world and life itself through cynical lenses.

That’s just one part of Reilly’s evolution in this episode. He also has sex with a young woman who was recently married to a stuffy and sickly English priest who looks to be nearing his 200th birthday. However, it was all just a guise to fool his Azerbaijani captors and escape with his oil report back to Britain. After she and her husband endured months of torture, they too are released and the wife, Margaret, has one heck of a story to tell. Reilly shows up, manages to sweep her off her feet, and convince her to marry him once her well-to-do husband dies. Presumably from the shock of his young wife’s infidelity (but in real life as a result of poison from Reilly and Margaret), the priest dies. Margaret inherits a fortune, which her new husband – Reilly – takes control of. They toast to the priest’s death with a chilled bottle of Lanson brut champagne.

If you've lived a good life, your wife should not be celebrating your funeral in this fashion. Or celebrating your death at all, really.

If you’ve lived a good life, your wife should not be celebrating your funeral in this fashion. Or celebrating your death at all, really.

How to Get the Look

Old school all the way. Pretty much everything about the suit screams vintage, so it would probably have to be a custom order if you wanted to replicate Reilly’s look. However, a modern take on it would probably look great if you can get your hands on a high-fastening mid-gray 3-piece suit.


  • Gray wool sack suit, consisting of:
    • Single-breasted 4-button sack coat with notch lapels, slanted welt breast pocket, straight flapped pockets, 3-button cuffs on gauntlet, and ventless rear
    • Double-breasted vest with 14-button high-fastening front, welted chest and hip pockets, and adjustable rear strap across gray silk
    • Flat front trousers with plain-hemmed bottoms, no rear pockets, and fishmouth rear waist for suspenders
  • White dress shirt with a detachable thin white club collar and French double cuffs
    • Round silver cuff links and collar studs
  • Thin black four-in-hand necktie
    • Pearl tie stickpin
  • Black leather balmorals/oxford shoes
  • Black dress socks
  • Silver pocket watch, worn in vest pocket and attached to silver “single Albert” chain and silver shield-shaped fob
  • Black homburg with black grosgrain ribbon
  • Black double-breasted belted overcoat with 4-button front, peak lapels (w/ velvet collars), flapped hip pockets, and flapped ticket pocket
  • Black leather gloves
  • Black umbrella
  • Black walking stick

Do Yourself a Favor and…

Buy the series.

This suit is only seen in the first episode, “An Affair with a Married Woman.”

The Quote

Seldom have I met a woman of more fortunate circumstances… young, beautiful, and about to come into a lot of money.

Reilly could be awfully persuasive, even when objectifying you.

Reilly could be awfully persuasive, even when objectifying you.


Reilly is shown working for Commander Cummings, the series’ version of Sir Mansfield Smith-Cumming, the eventual chief of MI6. At this point in time (1901), Cumming had little to do with the fledgling British Secret Service, which wasn’t formally in existence until 1909. Prior to that, the War Office had operated a counterintelligence division headed by William Melville and initiated in 1903, still two years after the series began.

At this point in history, Reilly was likely an informant in anarchist circles in London, reporting to Melville, who was the superintendent of Special Branch. His seduction and eventual marriage to Margaret had also taken place a few years earlier. As I mention in the post, it was most certainly a case of murder rather than the “accidental death” suggested by the series. I go into much more depth about this in my previous Reilly post.


  1. Pingback: Sidney Reilly’s Edwardian Charcoal Striped Suit | BAMF Style
  2. Roman

    Somehow, this suit feels like granddaddy of JB’s Goldfinger suit. Both are three-piece light gray suits (though I can’t say if Reilly’s one is sharkskin or basket weave) accompanied with white shirt and solid dark tie, worn by witty and womanizing super-spies. Of course, each suit has details dating it for its era – double-breasted waistcoat, Conduit cut, etc. – but I think that if Goldfinger was set during the dawn of 20th century, that’s the suit Bond would wear, and vice versa – Goldfinger suit would be outfit of choice for Reilly, had his story happen in 1960s. The only thing not matching in my view is pocketsquare – white for Bond, black for Reilly. If you’re into deep inner meanings (I’m not, but let’s play this game), this detail could signify the difference between two spies – despite his cynicism, Bond knows right from wrong, while Reilly is morally ambiguous.
    On the second thought, this congeniality is hardly a coincidence. I personally think that R:AoS costume designer planned to give Reilly some Bondian feel, and chose to do so through this suit. What do you think?

    • luckystrike721


      This is an excellent analysis – I hadn’t even thought of it! The makers of Reilly certainly did have Bond in mind; Sam Neill had screen-tested for Bond in ’83 and they mention Bollinger by name in the 9th episode. But getting back to the suit – it is pretty outstanding how similar they look. I can’t tell if Reilly’s is a sharkskin or a basket weave, either; unfortunately the production values and my relatively inexperienced eye don’t make a good match. However, the desired look was definitely achieved. Each man looks very fashion-forward for his time with the era details, as you mention. I like your white vs. black pocketsquare analysis. At the end of the day, Bond is always a hero, but Reilly is much more of a mercenary, for sale to the highest bidder and not above murder as a way of doing business. Great job!

      I hadn’t realized you were from Russia until our Condor discussions a few weeks ago; your English is very good! What region are you from?

      • Roman

        I’m from Chita, Zabaykalskiy Krai; not a big city, about half a mil; due to extreme climate conditions (ranging from “shoes get stuck in molten asphalt” in summer to “Charon, moon of Pluto” in winter) you have to have a wide variety of clothing – and your blog is invaluable for extra wardrobe diversity – thanks! Also, thanks for your kind words about my English; one’s language defines thinking patterns and vice versa, and I still can’t create logical constructions in English as good as I do in Russian – I’m much more eloquent in my native tongue. That’s why I should apologize for any possible logical fallacies in advance.

        Oh, I just got it – in this case, pocketsquares are spy fiction equivalent of classic western “white hat vs. black hat”. Damn, I love westerns.

        • luckystrike721

          Very interesting! Your hilarious and very visual description of Chita’s climate got me looking further into your city (with the help of Wikipedia) and it looks like Chita has a fascinating history. I have always been interested in Russian history and was even lucky enough to have a Russian History course open to me in college, which I naturally took to feed my interest. Your English is excellent and you raise a good point about language defining thinking patterns; perhaps that is why – in my opinion, at least – Russian literature is so good, even when poorly translated.

          I too love Westerns, anything from Tom Mix silents and John Wayne classics to violence-fests like The Wild Bunch and the modern revisionist efforts. Your astute observation about the hat-pocketsquare connections makes me wonder what a spy would think of a man wearing a red pocketsquare…

  3. Roman

    As you can remember, literary Bond didn’t trust guys who tie their ties with a Windsor knot. Guess he wouldn’t trust guys wearing brightly-colored pocketsquares either.

  4. Pingback: Meeting Sidney Reilly – A Cream Suit in Baku | BAMF Style

Leave a Reply